RE: [Exim] Most efficient spam rejection with Bogofilter

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Matt Sealey
Date:  
À: Exim Users Mailing List
Sujet: RE: [Exim] Most efficient spam rejection with Bogofilter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg A. Woods [mailto:woods@most.weird.com]
> Sent: 02 December 2003 21:28
> To: matt@???
> Cc: Exim Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Exim] Most efficient spam rejection with Bogofilter
>
>
> [ On Tuesday, December 2, 2003 at 18:28:15 (-0000), Matt Sealey wrote: ]
> > Subject: [Exim] Most efficient spam rejection with Bogofilter
> >
> > Just wondering what the most efficient/successful way is to
> > reject Spam once it has been evaluated by Bogofilter?
>
> If you're thinking of doing that in your mail server for all of your
> site's e-mail, then that's not a very good idea.


My site is 4 users, 2 of which use it every day, 2 of which don't and
don't get more than 1 email a week anyway, internally ;)

> The second problem is that bogofilter requires regular re-training. It


At least 2 of us will be retraining it. I do it habitually.

> Initially I trained it with my personal mail archives, and it still very
> often miss-identifies all the 419-fraud scams as non-spam, sometimes
> even giving them a spam rating of less than 0.5, perhaps though because
> there were relatively few of those in my archived spam folders!
> (btw, exim-users mail gets a consistent spamicity=0.000000 :-)


Well.. I don't care that some spam slip through. I know that all the
spam it DOES catch is legitimate spam, and I just want to force it
to never get to the inbox. The spam/ham ratio is low anyway, and
the caught/escaped spam ratio is some 25:1 - 25 less emails in my
inbox is good in my eyes.

--
Matt Sealey <matt@???>