Re: [Exim] Secondary MX and SPAM

> I set up a secondary mx wondering if this could be used to set up stricter spam
> filtering. Almost immediatly after adding the mx and reloading dns I started
> getting mail to it. Almost all of it is being rejected. I inspected one that
> passed and wonder about that one. Looks like the sender address failed but got
> delivered any how?
>
> >From log:
>
> [root@ns2 headers]# cat /var/log/exim/main.log |grep 1APsh9-0000rr-2B
> 2003-11-28 19:10:43 1APsh9-0000rr-2B <= rgwwir3ay3@???
>
> H=c68.115.96.127.roc.mn.charter.com [68.115.96.127] P=smtp S=2344
> id=aqi64uay4$-l48$lg68-e$25@8w2rt.8otc
>
> 2003-11-28 19:10:43 1APsh9-0000rr-2B ** dmoss@??? R=send_to_gateway
> T=remote_smtp: SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL
> FROM:<rgwwir3ay3@???> SIZE=3464: host mail.cisnet.com
> [68.22.80.4]: 550 5.1.8 <rgwwir3ay3@???> Invalid address
> 2003-11-28 19:10:43 1APsh9-0000ru-TX <= <> R=1APsh9-0000rr-2B U=mail P=local
> S=3333
> 2003-11-28 19:10:43 1APsh9-0000rr-2B Completed

There were no deliveries. There's no => line

I my self have thought that stricter spam blocking on secondary is an ok
idea. I myself have seen many spammers hit my secondary. (although
recently, I wouldn't know, my primary has been down to the world for 3
months.)

--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals