On (2003/11/28 09:34), Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> I have found an MACRO & acl statement which supposedly fixes
> the issue with the wildcard 64. IP address.
>
> The definition can be found at:
>
> http://www.giantrobot.co.nz/~jnt/stardotnet.html
>
> Just wondering if anyone has used the condition & how to test it.
That's overkill.
Since I already ignore target hosts in a file that lists known
unroutable networks, network addresses and broadcast addresses, I just
include wildcarded host addresses in that file:
-- In Exim configure file:
lookuphost:
driver = dnslookup
domains = ! +local_domains
ignore_target_hosts = /usr/local/etc/exim/unroutable-nets
transport = remote_smtp
no_more
-- In unroutable-nets file:
# List of hosts and/or networks which are known to be unroutable and to
# which it therefore does not make sense to attempt SMTP deliveries.
#
# WARNING! Don't just deploy this without consideration.
#
# You may be using some of these (e.g. 10.0.0.0/8) for private networks,
# in which case you'll want to remove them from the list and just
# include the network and broadcast addresses (e.g. 10.0.0.0/32 and
# 10.0.0.255/32).
#
0.0.0.0/8
10.0.0.0/8
127.0.0.0/8
169.254.0.0/16
172.16.0.0/12
192.0.2.0/24
192.168.0.0/16
204.152.64.0/23
224.0.0.0/3
#
# Nonexistent domain hijacking registrars
#
64.55.105.9/32 # NU A
64.94.110.11/32 # COM A
64.94.110.11/32 # NET A
194.205.62.122/32 # AC A
194.205.62.42/32 # TM A
194.205.62.62/32 # SH A
195.20.32.83/32 # TK A
195.20.32.86/32 # TK A
195.20.32.99/32 # TK MX
195.7.77.20/32 # MUSEUM A
203.119.4.6/32 # PH A
206.191.159.103/32 # CC MX
206.253.214.102/32 # CC A
212.181.91.6/32 # NU A
216.35.187.246/32 # WS A
216.35.187.251/32 # WS MX
219.88.106.80/32 # CX A
Ciao,
Sheldon.
