Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On (2003/11/27 09:19), Philip Hazel wrote:
>
>
>>Bottom line: "local domains" are whatever you define them to be.
>
>
> As an example...
>
> I have local domains and non-local domains, where the only difference is
> in the handling of non-existant localparts:
>
> local domain: fail
> non-local domain: dnslookup
>
> Instead of configuring routers and ACLs around the notion of locality of
> domain, I use the notion that addresses are either "locally routable"
> or not, the answer being returned by an... interesting PL/PGSQL stored
> procedure.
>
And, no doubt, 'valid' or not...
Bravo!
The way an MTA *should be* driven, IMHO - whether the DB is a 'heavy
lifter' like PG or simpler, such as GDB / BDB.
> Way flexible, is our old Exim. :-)
>
Hope so - will be looking at Exim+DBmail, later replacing DBMail to
implement some 'interesting' DB-based plans of my own....
Goal is easier single-sign-up and single-sign-on mail services with Plone...
> Ciao,
> Sheldon.
>
Regards,
Bill
