Tor Slettnes wrote:
> o Teergrubing! [3] This alone is probably its biggest advantage,
> and perhaps enough to choose this over ExiScan...
You can use exims 'delay' control statement to achive similar effects
with exiscan-acl. I don't know how configurable that can be made, but
you can use the full ACL power with it :)
> o Ability to save a copy of the message (whether rejected, temporarily
> rejected, teergrubed, etc..) into a Maildir tree. (Sure, ExiScan
> provides 'fakereject', but that's a bit harder to get working...)
Why? :) Just do fakereject, remember that fact in an ACL variable and
make a small router+transport combo that writes those messages
somewhere. In any format that exim supports. Actually you can do
anything that exim offers you.
> o Preservation of SA's headers, such as 'X-Spam-Status'; useful to
> keep in EXIM's "rejectlog". (ExiScan provides $spam_report, which
> can be added in a header, but there seems to be no way to get the
> "short" spam analysis (SA's _TESTS_ macro) logged using ExiScan).
Well, you can edit SA's report template to suit your needs ... :P
/tom
