Re: [Exim] Exim and RFC 2821 compliance

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Giuliano Gavazzi
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] Exim and RFC 2821 compliance
At 10:43 am +0000 2003/11/21, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>Russell King wrote, Friday, November 21, 2003 10:35 AM
>
>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:27:32AM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > It is. An empty return path is:
>> >
>> > MAIL FROM: <>
>>
> > Strictly, an empty return path is: MAIL FROM:<>
>>
>> IOW, no space between ':' and '<'. This applies to all MAIL FROM: SMTP
>> commands.
>
>Mea culpa. I did know that, I just fat-fingered it. :)


maybe more strictly MAIL FROM:<> is not an empty return path? Isn't
FROM:<> or just <> and empty return path? MAIL is a command!

Also, I wonder how long before this Mr Nils Puhlmann sends a message
with Subject: test...

Giuliano