--
Thanks for notifying me of that. I did not know. One of the very fine
reasons that I like this MTA the most is its documentation. Everything
is very well documented. Many reasons why I have stayed clear of
postfix. This goes the same way for cyrus however I do like sasl even
though its poorly documented. Keeping a standard mechanism for
authentication simplified making changes.
Dan Weber
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 05:32, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Dan Weber wrote:
>
> > I would like to request for the next release of the exim spec that
> > sasl is well documented. I only now found out how to use it after I
> > searched through the mailinglist for an hour or so.
>
> For the record/archive:
>
> The way I maintain the documentation is thus:
>
> . For the x.x0 releases, the documentation is fully up-to-date. The
> next release will be 4.30 and will be of this type. There is no need
> to request this to happen.
>
> . For intermediate releases, changes are listed in doc/ChangeLog, and
> new features are described in doc/NewStuff.
>
> . Copies of the ChangeLog and NewStuff files for each release are
> available separately on the ftp site:
>
> Change Log:
>
> ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/ChangeLogs/ChangeLog-4.24
> ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/ChangeLogs/ChangeLog-4.24.gz
>
> NewStuff:
>
> ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/ChangeLogs/NewStuff-4.24
> ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/ChangeLogs/NewStuff-4.24.gz
>
> The saslauthd feature is fully described in doc/NewStuff in the current
> release.
--------
Dan Weber
http://mirrorlynx.com
--
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ]
--
