This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
I actually tried Thunderbird about a year ago and found it quite good except
it seems to create a separate inbox for each pop account i added, unless i
missed a setting which could enable a single inbox, but i couldn't find it
at the time. That was my main reason for not using it.
Simon
-----Original Message-----
From: exim-users-admin@??? [
mailto:exim-users-admin@exim.org] On Behalf
Of Bernard Massot
Sent: 08 November 2003 17:10
To: exim-users@???
Subject: [Exim] Re: Re: OT: Outlook don't support multilines 550 return
codes ?!?
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 04:48:01PM -0000, Simon Bell wrote:
> Can anyone actually suggest a decent MUA for Windows? Im currently using
> Outlook 2003 and find in terms of usability its quite good.
The fact it doesn't work with multi-line error messages is far from
being its only problem.
It is responsible for the majority of the damage caused by viruses, it
doesn't work properly with mails signed with S/MIME (they appear as
empty messages !), it doesn't wrap lines correctly when there are
quotations, it adds a lot of useless headers, it is available only on
windows and macos (but microsoft is going to stop macos support) and
it's proprietary software.
Mozilla-mail (or thunderbird) sounds like a very good windows MUA.
--
Bernard Massot
--
## List details at
http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
details at
http://www.exim.org/ ##
--
[ smime.p7s of type application/x-pkcs7-signature deleted ]
--
