[Exim] terminated by signal 11

Góra strony
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Greg Folkert
Data:  
Dla: Exim List
Temat: [Exim] terminated by signal 11
--
Okay, I get this particular error message, and the a returning frozen
message that caused it.


> 2003-10-28 15:04:48 1AEa4W-0003J1-9Q == some_email@???
> R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp defer (-1): smtp transport process returned
> non-zero status 0x000b: terminated by signal 11


I can do all DNS related to this domain without problem from the machine
exim is running on. I get this ONLY for 1 domain and it is hosted

[root@mail exim4]# host -tmx somedomain.com
somedomain.com mail is handled by 5 mail2.mailrouter.net.
somedomain.com mail is handled by 25 mail3.mailrouter.net.
somedomain.com mail is handled by 25 mail4.mailrouter.net.
somedomain.com mail is handled by 50 mail0.mailrouter.net.
somedomain.com mail is handled by 5 mail1.mailrouter.net.

mailrouter.net is using sendmail with switch... narsty... for some
reason It send to me just fine... and when I switched from sendmail
(8.12.xxx) it wouldn;t work anymore from us to them.

I had to "smtp_enforce_sync = false" for some really bad hosts on the
incoming side but I thought that would help, but hasn't.

Any ideas? Running Exim v4.24 with the Exiscan-ACL patch Clamav during
ACL, Spam-Assassin Classically using a transport, router and
re-insertion method on Linux (sort of used to be RedHat 7.1 but now
mostly Debian by pieces-part replacement)

I have this setup of Exim(4.22) across ~40 hosts(most of which are pure
Debian) and would like to fixit so I don't see these problems. This is
the first 4.24 system so far.

And no, I have not yet been able to check from the 4.22 hosts as they
are only maintained by me, not run by me. Except I this one I use for
myself... hmmm. (will try it now)


> 2003-10-28 15:50:52 1AEamG-0001DH-9g => some_email@???
> R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=mail1.mailrouter.net [167.23.237.141]
> X=TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16


This is a host with the exact same setting for everything, just being in
4.22. I guess I am missing something about TLS... I guess I am about to
get a head-thwap with a clue-by-four. Someone please explain why to me.
This is some of the more obscure things I am not getting this time
around, where as I can't put my finger on it.

--
greg@???
REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry
--
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ]
--