On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:40:01AM +0100, Michael Haardt wrote:
> > To return to a technical discussion, how about this:
> > warn message = blah
> > spam = joe:true:spamd=127.0.0.1 783
> > ... where both the 'true' and 'spamd' options are of course optional.
At first glance this looks very nice, it is back- and forward
compatible. - Existing configs won't_have_ to be changed, and even an
old-exiscan won't barf on "spam = joe:true:spamd=127.0.0.1 783".
> > This is backwards compatible, and hey, you can have 'timeout=5s' and
> > 'error=ok' too if you like. The username will have to stay where it is
> > of course.
>
> You need to recognise AV pairs from existing options for that, so why
> mix them?
Could you please reformulate that? I don't understand that.
> You could as well decide at the first option if parsing should
> be done old style or new style.
Could you show some examples?
cu andreas
