On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Michael Haardt wrote:
> since nobody had any opinion concerning ignoring EINVAL as fsync()
> result: Philip, how about changing the code to do just that? I don't
> see why Exim should panic on EINVAL:
>
> EROFS, EINVAL
> fd is bound to a special file which does not support synchro-
> nization.
>
> Which directories may be. It's a hack on top of a hack.
Seems reasonable for the directory fsync (not for the file fsync, of
course). Noted.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
