Re: [Exim] Avoiding frozen spam

Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:

> At 12:22 -0700 2003/10/08, Mark Edwards wrote:
>
>> Well, I've obviously gotten something wrong, because I'm still
>> getting tons of frozen messages. Here's my ACL section, which is
>> simply from the default configure file with the /callout=30s added.
>> Shouldn't the callout be catching bad return addresses and preventing
>> frozen messages?
>>
>
> look, you are insisting in sending bounces even after you said you
> understood what that meant. I am pleased to know you have tons of
> frozen messages and I am tempted not to help you so that you'll stop
> in your foolish attempt.
>
> So I will not tell you that probably "fail" in a filter will use the
> header's and not the envelope sender, actually that must be since the
> specs warn about the risk of loops. This means you cannot check that
> address from an acl.
>
> Giuliano

Okay, well I'm trying to ask you for help here. Sorry I'm having a hard
time following your recommendations, but they aren't clear to me.

What are you suggesting instead of using fail? Creation of a new
message from the filter using $sender_address?