Re: [Exim] SIZE param for callbacks?

Chris Edwards wrote:

>
> So it doesn't seem too much of a stretch to attempt to check we can send a
> bounce of a plausible SIZE ?
>

I believe this has been discussed before, and it's a bit risky.
Over-quota conditions tend to be transient (at least for normal
mailboxes anyway), and the callout caching would interfere because it
wouldn't retry the callout soon enough after the over-quote had been
cleared. If you lower the callout cache expire time, then you generate
many more callouts and that's a waste of resources (on both ends).