On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Dean Brooks wrote:
> Ok, I figured out the problem.
Excellent. I do so like it when I ignore a problem for long enough for
the sufferer to do all the hard work of figuring it out! :-)
> It's still probably a bug that should be fixed, but at least I know
> the cause.
Agreed, but I don't see any immediate hurry; I'll do it in due course.
> Someone else may run into this, so may be worth using a default port
> number if it can't determine one from an applicable router.
I think I agree with Nico that this should perhaps be an error rather
than picking a default.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
