Hi Calum,
sorry for lateness in the response to your email but i have been occupied.
About the las message where you have told me that i was only
authenticating user that accepts the server certificate for stablish a
tunnel and just this... in fact this is what i want. I don't want to
spread a lot of certificates for the users of my mta. I only want they
accept the server certificate and validate using plain text over ssl.
Just this.
This will explain that i'm not using the remote_sslsmtp transport,
because i don't need it. It a rest of configuration after some testing.
I would appreciate your comment about my configuration, if you think i
have configured properly my server an so on...
Receive my best regards,
jonathan
Calum Mackay wrote:
> This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
> --
> thanks Philip,
>
>
>>Aha! GnuTLS. That explains some things. I'm using OpenSSL, where there
>>is apparently more debugging
>
>
> btw: I'm using GnuTLS for no other reason than that I'm using the Debian
> exim4 pkg, and this is how it's compiled (I believe because of licence
> restrictions with the openssl libs).
>
> Does anyone have tls_verify_hosts working with GnuTLS?
>
> cheers,
> c.
> --
> Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
>
> [ smime.p7s of type application/x-pkcs7-signature deleted ]
> --
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
--
__________________________________________________________________
Jonathan Gonzalez - SureStorm.com Security Site - Madrid/MA/SPAIN
http://www.surestorm.com - GnuPG Key ID = 0xAA3EAC08
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X Against HTML mail & Microsoft attachments
/ \
