On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 09:53, Pat Lashley wrote:
> However, that said, is there any particular reason why messages coming
> into the mailing list address aren't checked for viri before being sent
> back out? (Outgoing messages from the list shouldn't need to be scanned
> since they have, theoretically at least, already been scanned once on
> the way in. So the scanning overhead is based on the number of unique
> messages sent to the list, not to the size of the list membership.)
Two reasons:-
1. I don't run virus checking on any of my boxes, because all the
end users are configured in a virus avoiding fashion. However I
do kill messages with executable extentions. [The EICAR problem
is that it doesn't need to be in an attachment for most virus
scanners to pick it up.] I'm not keen on running finickity
software that I don't have experience with on a box providing
real service. Previous reasons for not doing so were that there
was no free AV software and no budget.
2. exim.org is seriously overloaded. Until it gets new hardware I
am not putting additional services on to it. Thats why
SpamAssassin isn't in the mailing list chain either.
Having said that I added a regexp rule to the exiscan acls to kill EICAR
stuff.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]