Re: [Exim] Expansion of wildlsearch keys: opinions sought

On (2003/09/11 14:37), Andreas Metzler wrote:

> I agree with you, changing the semantics of "wildlsearch" sounds like
> a very bad idea.

How about some sideways movement instead? How about extending
wildlsearch in the same way that lsearch was extended to accept '*' and
'@' modifiers? Perhaps '!' (meaning "do what I say, damnit!")?

Ciao,
Sheldon.