On Thursday 11 September 2003 07:53, Robert Kehl wrote:
> You could best use SpamAssassin at SMTP receiving time, see
> http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan-acl/ for info. This way you avoid feeding
> the messages twice. Speeds up things, btw, but speed meight not always
> matter, I know.
Robert, exiscan may be not bad solution, but i need to copy every message to
inarchive and only then move messages with x-spam-status: yes to spam@. Is it
possible in case of exiscan?
>
> If you depend on scanning for SPAM at routing time -the way you use it
> now - you might use the same condition by which the spamassassin router
> itself determines messages that have already been scanned. In other
> words: the archiving router won't archive any message that has been
> scanned, because that would mean the message has already been archived.
> It goes like this:
okee, but in/out archiving at this moment are produced by system filter, not
by archiving router, because i don'd realize how to create a copy of message
with router. Can you be a little more specific at this point ?
--
Michael V. Sokolov, SA/Helpdesk
