On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> I have had problem on upstream server [that i do not manage] so it is
> possible the message has not reached the list. Mi idea was that
> althought chnging internal behaviour of the program is not usually a
> good thing, this change could not be so severe, since even the
> behaviour of the user has changes, increasingly finding encoded
> headers. A poll shopuld be the best thing to door, why not adding a
> /etc/exim/headr.option file to decide to use old or new behaviour by
> default (and adding a $dh_ as a decoded version, so each one by
> selcting the proper option on that file could choose the meaning for $h_
I feel that the majority of non-expert users just won't understand the
issues here. They are most likely just to use $h_ and it seems best to
try to make that do what they probably expect it to do.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
