Re: [Exim] address_data lost if deferred

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:55:25 +0100 (BST) Philip Hazel <ph10@???> wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Phil Chambers wrote:
>
> > This worked as I hoped when the file mode was correct. If I set the mode to force a
> > defer, the log shows the message to be deferred by that transport. However, after
> > fixing the mode on the file and re-trying the delivery with eximon, the message was
> > ignored by the router and ended up being delivered by another transport!
>
> Run a delivery with -d to see *why* it is using another transport.
> Presumably it's using another router, which presumably doesn't add the
> header lines.
>
> Are you testing for first_delivery or $message_age or something that
> makes the routing different the second time?
>

I see what is happening! I ran the message submission with "-C /.../test-config" on
the command line. When I use eximon to do a second delivery is invokes exim without
it and uses the standard configuration. Silly me!

Phil.
---------------------------------------
Phil Chambers (postmaster@???)
University of Exeter