On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Phil Chambers wrote:
> This worked as I hoped when the file mode was correct. If I set the mode to force a
> defer, the log shows the message to be deferred by that transport. However, after
> fixing the mode on the file and re-trying the delivery with eximon, the message was
> ignored by the router and ended up being delivered by another transport!
Run a delivery with -d to see *why* it is using another transport.
Presumably it's using another router, which presumably doesn't add the
header lines.
Are you testing for first_delivery or $message_age or something that
makes the routing different the second time?
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
