Re: [Exim] TURN support

On (2003/07/25 11:32), Philip Hazel wrote:

> Any attempt to implement TURN or ATRN directly inside Exim just has to
> be a bodge. I also know that if the specification says
>
> "Exim supports TURN, subject to these very special conditions and
> restrictions.",
>
> people will take that to mean "Exim supports TURN." Then there will
> be complains, criticisms, etc that "Exim claims to support TURN but it
> does a really bad job of it."

Philip, I'm not usually a fan of your conservatism when it comes to
adding new features[1], but I'm behind you all the way on this one.

No end of pain lies down this road. I think it makes a lot more sense
to handle this completely outside Exim.

Ciao,
Sheldon.

[1] Still missing no_fsync. :-)