From: Kirill Miazine <km-lists@???>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:47:07 +0200
I intentionally did not mention that you would get "Unrouteable
address". This was supposed to force you do actually read a bit of the
documentation. To no luck. :/
Do you think this is some kind of game? You actually knew the
situation, but you thought you'd conceal it to make extra work for me?
Thanks a lot, buddy! I thought the point of answering people's mail
on mailing lists was to actually help them, not to play games. But I
suppose that you personally have read every line of the documentation
for every program that you use, so you wouldn't understand. But
thanks for finally dolling out the useful tidbit that the default
message can be changed more conveniently than using the test that I
had proposed.
Flame off.
I continue to believe that either the default configuration should be
changed to work properly with :fail:, presumably by using
cannot_route_message, or else the documentation for :fail: in the
redirect router should explain that configuration changes are
necessary to allow it to work.
Ken
