Re: [Exim] error response rate limiting vs. overloaded syste…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Exim Users Mailing List
Date:  
To: Avleen Vig
CC: Exim Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Exim] error response rate limiting vs. overloaded systems
[ On Sunday, July 6, 2003 at 07:14:51 (-0700), Avleen Vig wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: [Exim] error response rate limiting vs. overloaded systems
>
> Specify a period.. 30 seconds? I need something to start with. I'll
> assume 30 seconds.


30 is good, 60 is far better, and if you can afford the resources then
120 to 180 is probably the ideal range. If my client's mailer were not
also their end-user web server then I would be using 180. Three times
as many idle connections would be well worth the price to pay.

--
                                Greg A. Woods


+1 416 218-0098;            <g.a.woods@???>;           <woods@???>
Planix, Inc. <woods@???>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@???>