On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 07:01:13AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Greg A. Woods wrote:
> >I've yet to see a system that can handle normal peak loads without
> >slowing down which can't also handle at least a 60-second error response
> >delay for all SMTP errors. Furthermore note that the tuning needed to
>
> What about an already heavily overloaded system?
Greg:
Your idea is noble, and works on a small scale, but on the scale of
accepting 300+ new connections, per machine, per second, they just don't
work unless you at least quadrouple your hoursepower.
