RE: [Exim] Problem with Exim 3.3x split configuration (MailS…

Top Pagina
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Auteur: Schramm, Dominik
Datum:  
Aan: Exim-Users (E-Mail)
Onderwerp: RE: [Exim] Problem with Exim 3.3x split configuration (MailScanner): "Remote Host is the local host"
Hi again,

> 2003-06-23 08:23:01 19UKjE-0002Hi-00 <= Order@??? H=(Internet) [Internet] ....
> 2003-06-23 08:23:01 19UKjE-0002Hi-00 == organizer@??? R=defer_router defer (-1): remote host address is the local host
> 2003-06-23 08:23:01 19UKjE-0002Hi-00 ** organizer@???: retry timeout exceeded
> 2003-06-23 08:23:01 19UKjE-0002Hi-00 Error message sent to Order@???
> 2003-06-23 08:23:01 19UKjE-0002Hi-00 Completed
>
> 2003-06-19 00:08:01 19Sl60-0006NM-00 <= ml-errors@??? H=(newsfeed.cts.com) [Internet] ....
> 2003-06-19 00:08:02 19Sl60-0006NM-00 == xy@??? R=defer_router defer (-1): remote host address is the local host
> 2003-06-19 00:08:02 19Sl60-0006NM-00 ** xy@???: retry timeout exceeded
> 2003-06-19 00:08:02 19Sl60-0006NM-00 Error message sent to ml-errors@???
> 2003-06-19 00:08:02 19Sl60-0006NM-00 Completed
>
> 2003-06-16 08:38:00 19Rncu-0004sM-00 <= organizer@??? H=(...) [10.16.24.9 LAN!!] ....
> 2003-06-16 08:38:01 19Rncu-0004sM-00 == abc@??? R=defer_router defer (-1): remote host address is the local host
> 2003-06-16 08:38:09 19Rncu-0004sM-00 => abc@??? R=lookuphost T=remote_smtp H=(Internet) [Internet]
> 2003-06-16 08:38:09 19Rncu-0004sM-00 Completed


I may have stumbled upon the solution myself:
Although the incoming process is queue_only
somehow a queuerunner cron job sneeked in (maybe through a software update)
which runs "8,23,38... *".
I removed it and will keep watching, but I think that'll fix it.

One more question though:

In a router with
> self = defer

is the additional information necessary for syntactic reasons
(like the smarthost address in a domainlist router)
actually relevant? I'm using e.g.

defer_router:
driver = domainlist
self = defer
route_list = * 127.0.0.1 byname
no_verify

Should I put a non-local address in route_list or is it okay like this?

Thanks and regards
Dominik Schramm