Re: [Exim] Bug in prefix generic director option?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Dennis Davis
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] Bug in prefix generic director option?
>From: "John R. Shearer" <exim-users@???>
>To: exim-users@???
>Subject: [Exim] Bug in prefix generic director option?
>Sender: exim-users-admin@???
>Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 09:12:25 -0700


...

>It appears that the prefix definition is not being subjected to
>string expansion. I don't know if this qualifies as a bug report
>or a feature request, but I do think that it would be consistent to
>expand prefix/suffix definitions.


You don't say what version of exim you are using. However
prefix/suffix are exim3 options. Their exim4 equivalents are
local_part_prefix and local_part_suffix. Both exim3 and exim4
manuals document these options as string lists that aren't expanded.
So this would be a feature request, not a bug report.