[ On Friday, May 16, 2003 at 15:35:27 (-0700), Bill Moseley wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: [Exim] I wish HELO had never been thought of!
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 03:04:31PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> >
> > The NAT _MUST_ appear to be invisible for all intents and purposes, no
> > matter which way the SMTP connection is going through it.
>
> I assume that does not include a received header that might track internal flow.
Of course not! What does SMTP have to do with RFC [2]822 headers???
> I think the smarthost is the best plan,
If you're talking about a laptop or similar, then yes....
> and then pick some method to securely use the
> smarthost when I'm on the outside of the smarthost.
You should do that anyway.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <g.a.woods@???>; <woods@???>
Planix, Inc. <woods@???>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@???>
