Re: [Exim] verify = recipient/callout

On Tue, 13 May 2003, Philip Hazel wrote:

> > In other words, the code seems right, the manual seems wrong.
>
> I agree. Unfortunately, I have just "wrapped up" the 4.20 manual, and
> I'm loath to unwrap it again at this late stage. I have therefore just
> noted the change for the next edition, whenever that comes...

Just a suggestion, but perhaps the manual could have a fairly
prominent link to the URL of an Errata web page, where corrections can
be placed temporarily until they get folded into the manual itself.