Re: [Exim] TARPIT ACL - for Spam Control

Philip Hazel wrote:

> Use of "delay" shouldn't affect the use of "message". If you can send a
> real example that I can reproduce, I will investigate (but not
> immediately).

I'm sorry, I made a mistake in my post: what I meant to say was that "message"
doesn't seem to produce anything when used in an "accept" (in combination with a
delay, but that should not matter). In any case it does not message back to the
SMTP session.

I'd like to use this to warn a sender why they see a slow response: they are on
a DUL list.


Thomas