> >You *REALLY* like exim4, don't you =) >
> Yes ;)
> Everyone does, after they tried it ;)
> It saves you headaches, is more flexible and more powerful, Philip did a
> great job to make exim4 better than exim3. (And exim3 was/is still quite
> good)
I prefer exim 4 over exim 3 too. I have a config file already setup to go,
it's just it's not going to be a simple pop it in and I'm done.
The server is debian and I'm using the exim4 packages from experimental
(which exim4 is quite stable for me). It's just I have to remove exim3 and
install exim4 and copy over my config. I like doing things silently, but
this I don't think can be done that way.
> >Maybe one of these days, I can upgrade this server to exim4. If it didn't
> >take a complete configuration overhaul, I could easily.
>
> Well, convert4r4 does a great job in converting the config (but
> sometimes it's better to start from scratch).
IMO, it's way better to start from scratch. convert4r4 doesn't know about
things (unless changed in phil's testing version 4.15/20) like sender_reject
(it assumes sender_reject_recipients). I went through my config line by
line checking everything. Would have been worth my time to just rewrite it
=)
