William Thompson wrote:
> I was going to do something like this, but instead of doing it in ACLs, I
> was going to do it in the routers because the data acl is ran once per
> message (right? =). I am setting up message size limits (inbound) for users
> and checking in the routers seems to be the best solution.
That's right, BUT he's doing the checks on a per-sender base, not per
recipient.
