Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 02:47:19PM +0200, Nico Erfurth wrote:
>
>>>Nico, at one time, was <> not required?
>>
>>I don't think so, maybe in the VERY early days (before I was born, or
>>even could say SMTP ;))
>
> <> has *always* been required, unless I'm misunderstanding you, as a method
> for avoiding delivery loops.