* jwsacksteder@??? <jwsacksteder@???> [20030426 00:03]: wrote:
> It would be very useful to have a callout verification option to use
> VRFY instead of RCPT when verification is called for. I attempted to put
> together a patch to accomplish this, but I'm not quite sure how it
> should interact with the random_local_part callout. I'm thinking they
> should be mutually exclusive if I'm understanding this correctly. For
> the moment, I have hit the limits of my programming ability, so if
> anyone can steer me in the right direction I would be grateful. A
> working patch would be even better!
Some folks explicitly disable VRFY on their boxes and I do believe it doesn't
break any RFC to do that ;-)
-Wash
--
Odhiambo Washington <wash@???> "The box said 'Requires
Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com Windows 95, NT, or better,'
Tel: +254 2 313985-9 +254 2 313922 so I installed FreeBSD."
GSM: +254 72 743223 +254 733 744121 This sig is McQ! :-)
To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide
a test load.
