On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> Philip, PAX is meant to help against buffer overflows and creates a non
> executable stack.
> I'm not much of a x86 expert, but PAX killed exim with a SIGKILL because
> EIP: 00002A42, ESP: 5909799C
> I suppose that means EIP is incorrect which is why PAX killed exim.
Aha. I now understand where the SIGKILL came from. I was assuming it was
human-generated.
> If I were to guess, I'd be looking at GnuTLS.
It it quite new code, so yes, I'd agree.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
