Re: [Exim] HELO acl

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MWilliam Thompson at <-
MTony Earnshaw at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Matthew Byng-Maddick
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] HELO acl
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 08:13:34AM -0500, William Thompson wrote:
> I see. I can think of a few others that aren't valid.
> 0.0.0.0/7, 2.0.0.0/8, 240.0.0.0/4 off the top of my head.

They're not private networks, though. They're Reserved, Reserved and
Multicast / Reserved. We had this discussion on here. See also RFC3330.

MBM 

--
Matthew Byng-Maddick         <mbm@???>           http://colondot.net/



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Exim] HELO aclRe: [Exim] small problem with quote_ldap->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)