On 29 Mar 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> In Local/Makefile I have the ssl libs as:
>
> SUPPORT_TLS=yes
> TLS_LIBS=-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lssl -lcrypto
>
> That's supposed to be Openssl 0.9.7a, libssl.so.0.9.7. However,
> libssl.so.0.9.6 is there too. I /could/ rip it out, but I'm a coward.
>
> libcrypto of both is also there.
>
> Why is Exim linking in both at once (ldd shows it is)?
No idea, I'm afraid. I am definitely *not* an expert on the linking of
Unix programs, especially when shared libraries are involved. It's all
pretty much black magic as far as I am concerned, and there also seem to
be different shades of black on different operating systems...
Do you have symlinks for libssl and libcrypto pointing to the versioned
library files? I vaguely recall having trouble in the past when they did
not exist.
> Other services
> and utilities, such as Openldap 2.1.16, aren't; they choose the
> highest/newest version. Is Exim finding things in 0.9.6 it can't find in
> 0.9.7a?
I suppose that's possible.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
