On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, William Thompson wrote:
> Would an helo acl be useful?
I didn't think so, which is why I didn't implement it.
> I wanted it (and have added it locally). If anyone would like the small
> patch (phil? =) I'll send it.
It's clearly a small patch, and I don't mind including it if people want
it. But what is the benefit? Is this the argument that you should reject
HELO/EHLO instead of sending a rejection at connection time? I don't
myself see much difference.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
