Re: [Exim] verify=sender/callout performance?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tony Finch
Date:  
To: flavell
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] verify=sender/callout performance?
"Alan J. Flavell" <flavell@???> wrote:
>On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, John Dalbec wrote:
>
>> The documentation mentions that verify=sender/callout is a
>> performance hit.
>
>Sure - you've got to do practically all the work of setting up a
>fresh mail transaction.


Unless there's a cache hit.

>And many an MTA will do no more than confirm an address as
>syntactically correct, irrespective of whether it really exists,
>which makes the callout a waste of time and effort.


That's what verify = sender/callout,random is for.

>BTW, callout can also block mail from envelope senders whose mail
>domain never responds.


If you are inclined towards charity in this case then use
verify = sender/callout,defer_ok

Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@???> http://dotat.at/
THE WASH TO NORTH FORELAND: EAST TO SOUTHEAST 3 OR 4. FAIR. MODERATE OR GOOD.
SLIGHT.