On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
> i'm seeing very similar code in v3 too, but i can't get it to crash.
> could anyone confirm or deny that ?
It's wrong on v3. The only reason the compiler doesn't pick this up as
an error is that 0 is synonymous with NULL and NULL is a valid pointer.
Otherwise, it might have noticed that I had assigned a number to a
pointer. :-(
A lot of the time it won't crash.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
