Re: [Exim] Reaction to rude 554 greeting

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Exim Users Mailing List
Date:  
To: Eric Kuzniar
CC: Exim List
Subject: Re: [Exim] Reaction to rude 554 greeting
[ On Tuesday, March 18, 2003 at 11:05:37 (-0500), Eric Kuzniar wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: [Exim] Reaction to rude 554 greeting
>
> But you never had the situation where one of the bosses was
> decommisioned but that information just didn't propagate to you yet.


No, a "de-commissioned" SMTP server will return TCP RST packets to
connection attempts on port 25.

Any idiot configuring a de-commissioned or "out-of-service" SMTP server
to return any 5xx response gets what he or she deserves -- no e-mail.

> Interpret 554 to be something along the lines of that decommisioned boss
> saying I cannot answer that for you.


No, do not do that because doing so would be wrong. Any 5xx is an
indication of a _permanent_ delivery failure and _MUST_ be treated as
such.

Please everyone quit trying to invent lame exuses for this misfeature!

--
                                Greg A. Woods


+1 416 218-0098;            <g.a.woods@???>;           <woods@???>
Planix, Inc. <woods@???>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@???>