At 11:25 +0000 2003/03/17, Philip Hazel wrote: >On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> If this is okay with you, I'll see if I can come up with a patch.
>
>Sure. Go ahead. The biggest problem will be choosing a name for the
>option. :-)
>
>connect_treat_5xx_as_4xx
> [...]
For what's worth, I would not use that option, rather a, if feasable,
connect_treat_554_as_IPConnectFailed
For reasons that might be evident from my latest tirade...
