On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Rick Ennis wrote:
> I think I found a solution to my problem of getting the real [routed]
> user name into $address_data, and hence back to local_scan. But I'm not
> too familiar with most of these internal variables. So maybe Philip can
> tell me if this change would cause a memory leak or anything.
There won't be a memory leak - all Exim processes are short-lived,
apart from the daemon, and that does very little other than fork other
processes.
You do appear to have found a bug/infelicity in the handling of
address_data.
You'll be pleased to hear that you seem to have found the correct fix.
However, I haven't done more than take a quick glance at this. I've put
it on my work list to investigate in more detail in due course.
Philip
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
