Peter Benie wrote:
> Nico Erfurth writes:
>
>>Hi Philip & List,
>>
>>I've found this in my reject.log, what's the problem with this.
>>
>>2003-03-13 18:40:57 18tWhN-0003xN-De H=exim-colo-01.whoc.theplanet.co.uk
>>[195.92.249.251] F=<exim-users-admin@???> rejected after DATA:
>>malformed address: <exim-users@???>\n may not follow
>>exim-users@??? : failing address in "To" header is:
>>exim-users@??? <exim-users@???>
>>
>>This is the logged To: header. (Was logged in a single line)
>>
>
> [The following line is rewrapped for clarity.]
>
>>T To: Bernard Massot <bmassot@???>,
>> exim-users@??? <exim-users@???>
>
> ^
>
> The phrase, exim-users@???, is invalid because it must be a
> sequence of words, and words must be atoms or quoted-strings. It
> obviously isn't quoted, and '@'is a special and therefore not allowed
> in an atom.
>
> The following would be allowed:
>
> "exim-users@???" <exim-users@???>
>
> See the syntax specification at the end of RFC822.
Ahh, silly me, sorry for spamming the list with this, maybe I was just
to depressed because I've missed a mail ;)
Nico
