Tony Finch wrote:
> What does it have that other list managers don't? I'm particularly
* Web Interface that doesn't look like ass (OK, beauty is in the eye of
the beholder, or something).
* Independent SQL Backend that can be tweaked with your own applications
if you don't like the provided web interface. Writing a shell/mail
application should not be really hard.
* Full "virtual" domain support (you can have "mylist@???" and
"mylist@???").
* Traffic accounting per list and user
In general, it is more suited to manage workgroup-like list (large
number of smaller lists). The largest list I have tried was 3500 users.
> the ability to distribute list message handling across a cluster of
> email servers. Too many list managers seem to be a new design of
> triangular wheel.
The existing (free) solutions did not do what I wanted them to do. I
just invented my own wheel, which is in my preferred shape :)
/tom
--
Tom Kistner <tom@???>
ICQ 1501527 dcanthrax@efnet
http://duncanthrax.net
