194.90.15.0/24
194.90.15.1/24
194.90.15.50/24
194.90.15.121/24
All the same :)
--------------------------
Canaan Surfing Ltd.
Internet Service Providers
Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
Tel: 972-4-6991122
Fax: 972-4-6990098
http://sites.canaan.co.il
--------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "James P. Roberts" <punster@???>
To: "Nico Erfurth" <masta@???>; "Tony Earnshaw"
<tonni@???>
Cc: <exim-users@???>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Exim] host_accept_relay Problem
> > Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> > > man, 2003-03-10 kl. 12:43 skrev Ben-Nes Michael:
> > >
> > >
> > >>host_accept_relay = localhost:194.90.15.1/24
> > >
> > >
> > > Just as a general point of interest, your C-Class network would be
> > > 194.90.15.0/24; 194.90.15.1 would have a CIDR mask of /32.
> >
> > HU?
> >
> > /32 would be the mask for a single host, not for a network
> >
> > Nico
> >
>
> Precisely his point, I am sure!
>
> As a practical matter, due to the nature of the mask (i.e. only the first
/N
> bits matter), I'm not sure it makes any difference whether one uses
> 194.90.15.0/24 (correct) or 194.90.15.1/24 (incorrect). But, technically,
> Tony's observation is accurate. A poorly written piece of code could
possibly
> screw up any netmask comparisons using an incorrectly specified CIDR such
as
> the above example. But I would never imagine Exim to have anything that
badly
> written in it! :)
>
> Jim Roberts
> Punster Productions, Inc.
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
details at
http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
>
