On 10 Mar 2003, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Ah, OK. That's cunning. Thanks for the correction. Is that new (since
> about v2 when I first started trying to pay attention)?
It was always there, but it got cleverer at one point (matching equal-MX
hosts as sets rather than in order). Can't remember exactly when.
> > qmail makes a virtue of delivering each address in a separate
> > connection, as I understand it.
>
> And I'm sure there's some tortuous explanation why that's a good thing
> and you should never try to do otherwise. :)
No comment.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
