On Wednesday 26 February 2003 11:42, Philip Hazel wrote:
Hello again,
this time i really got new information for you.
First: you were right.
There was an illegal element in the list:
.61.130.22
This should not happen, but is a bug in our popb4smtp-software, which i will
fix.
But the question still remains, why does exim behave the way it does and deny
the whole relay - and why doesn't it log the error. Should exim simply go on
with the next entry in the list?
I hope this is the information you need to reproduce the error and maybe fix
the "Bug" in exim, if you think it's one.
Thank you very much for your help, and excuse again, i could not feed you with
the information you needed. But this was very tricky since this error only
occured every 3 days. Because of this it was a little bit difficult to obtain
the relayhosts-file, when the error occured and then go through it element by
element.
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Andreas Gietl wrote:
> > But what really disturbs me is the fact, that no reason is logged into
> > the logs. Shouldn't exim log a reason? Phil said that it might be an
> > effect of a missing log_error in the acl-definition. But i added one to
> > every deny.
>
> I will take a look and see if I can reproduce this.
>
> --
> Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
> ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
> details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--
e-admin internet gmbh
Andreas Gietl tel +49 941 3810884
Ludwig-Thoma-Strasse 35 fax +49 89 244329104
93051 Regensburg mobil +49 171 6070008
PGP/GPG-Key unter
http://www.e-admin.de/gpg.html
