Re: [Exim] MX Record points to non-existant host

At 14:44 -0500 2003/02/22, James P. Roberts wrote:
> > >Note, it must be fixed in 3 places, since there are 3 name
>> >servers involved.
>>
>> I imagine James had just had one too many when writing this!
>> [this is a friendly remark, btw]
>>
>> Giuliano
>
>Friendliness accepted. :)
>
>Why the remark at all though? It really must be fixed consistently in
>all three name servers, which are specified as being authoritative name
>servers for that zone. Now, one or more (of NS1, NS2, and NS3) may be
>slaves, and the data might cascade when the master is updated, if all is
>set up right. However, given the record to date, I wouldn't trust them
>to get it right the first time! ;)
>
>Jim

Damn, if they haven't got one master only then they *are* going to be
in trouble!
I must admit that you have a point, though: they might be that
clueless after all. Probably they run Linux, eh eh.

Giuliano