Re: [Exim] What to do about non-monitonic process ids

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Jason Robertson
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] What to do about non-monitonic process ids
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Jason Robertson wrote:

> In future versions the unique message number might be more advisable
> to go with Hex, it may offer a larger range from 00-99


It is already in base 62, offering the range 00-zz (0-3883).

> I wouldn't want to see it roll over at 99, but i have seen message such
> as 18ewIL-0008FW-00 to -40's.


That's (to me) surprisingly large, because 40 in base 62 = 248 decimal.
Did you really receive that many messages in a second (assuming you
weren't setting localhost_number)? Wow.

--
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.